GLPOLY Thermal Gap Filler vs CGW-2 For EV Battery Cooling

Take CGW-2 as benchmark model, GLPOLY launches an alternative product—thermal gap filler XK-S20. More than 20 technical data had been tested, GLPOLY is the only one that possess such a professional inspection ability.
We don’t just give customer a specification, we’ll test physical, electrical and thermal properties according to customers’ statement after we get samples, then we test every parameter of GLPOLY thermal gap filler XK-S20, all these test reports will be submitted to customers. Actually, many counterparts don’t even undertand the test standard of each parameter. How they can provide alternatives.
Firstly, silicone oil leakage is less than 5% by test standard of ASTM D120. Maybe some people laugh at us why do you release the true report? Customers don’t know the detail. We don’t provide fake data and never. Test report showed that XK-S20’s oil leakage is half of CGW-2’s.
Secondly, Pressure and compression. 30% of compression under 40psi, it’s tested by universal mechanical instrument. During the test, GLPOLY R&D supervisor found that this test standard is not fit for compression test. GLPOLY drew up a scheme for compression test, it is not only considered as corporate standard, but also industry standard.
Thirdly, viscosity. This is one of most concerned points. Viscosity affects quality and dispensing speed of thermal gap filler. Once, one of our customers said GLPOLY XK-S20’s viscosity of 320pas is too high, and requested us to decrease the value to 240 pas which CGW-2 provides. Actually CGW-2 provides a viscosity of 330 pas, “maybe there is difference between test instrument or given revolution .” We discussed this with customer. When we contrast the data, we need to understand or make clear if there is any difference between customer’s test standard or instrument and ours.
To be honest, GLPOLY is the only one that provides true comparison between its products and competitors’.

Minimum Order: 10 pieces

Click to Enlarge